The BLG Leadership Framework©

Six domains of leadership people can feel.

Each domain names a set of conditions that leaders create. Every BLG reflection, report, and 360 looks at the same six, so you always know what you are measuring and why.

Balance, not more is better. Each domain runs from a leader-held approach to a shared, team-held approach, and both ends can be effective. The goal is the right balance for your context, not the top of the scale.
01

Know and Grow Your Team

Knowing your people as people, and growing each one on purpose. People do their best work for leaders who see them and invest in them.

What it looks like in practice

You understand what energizes each person, fit your support to them, and pair care with clear expectations.

Research anchors: Mayer et al., 1995; Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1995; Gerstner & Day, 1997 (see references)

Example behaviors

  • Makes time to learn what is going on for each person, beyond the task list.
  • Knows what each person hopes to grow toward, and helps them move that way.
  • Offers different kinds of help to different people, based on what each one needs.
  • Fits coaching to the person, and asks what they have in mind before offering answers.
  • Handles hard conversations with respect: listens first, then is plain about what needs to change.
  • Keeps the goal the same for everyone, while flexing the path when someone's situation calls for it.
02

Build a Shared Vision

Getting clear, together, on where you are going and why. When people help shape the direction, they can explain it and act on it.

What it looks like in practice

The team helps shape the vision, can say the "why" in their own words, and sees itself in how success is measured.

Research anchors: Kirkpatrick & Locke, 1996; Robinson et al., 2008; Burde, 2016 (see references)

Example behaviors

  • Brings the team into setting direction early, while ideas are still taking shape.
  • Checks in on the direction together on a regular rhythm, and keeps what still holds.
  • Works with the team to turn big goals into a short list of what comes first.
  • Helps people put the purpose into their own words.
  • Grows other voices who carry the message when the leader is away.
  • Agrees with the team on what progress will look like and how it will be tracked.
03

Lead the Learning

Knowing the work yourself and learning it alongside your team. Leaders make better calls when they understand the core work firsthand.

What it looks like in practice

You stay close to the real work, learn in public as a participant, and let your experts keep visible authority.

Research anchors: Hallinger, 2003; Robinson et al., 2008; Vescio et al., 2008; Burde, 2016 (see references)

Example behaviors

  • Spends time where the core work happens and knows it firsthand.
  • Asks sharp questions that show real study of the details.
  • Explores new ideas side by side with colleagues who know them best.
  • Shows up to team learning as a learner, not an observer.
  • Teaches what they know well, and invites others to push back.
  • Keeps building their own expertise, and lets the team see it.
05

Clarify Decisions and Share Ownership

Making clear who decides, and bringing the right people in early. Clear roles and real involvement turn plans into action people own.

What it looks like in practice

Decision rights are clear before work begins, people are involved while options are still open, and someone owns the next step.

Research anchors: Hallinger & Heck, 2010; Wang et al., 2014; Burde, 2016 (see references)

Example behaviors

  • Shares real decision power with the team on choices that matter.
  • Works out with the team who decides what, before the work starts.
  • Draws in voices from across roles, including people who will live with a change.
  • Involves people while options are still forming, not after.
  • Lets the team help design how the plan gets done and who does what.
  • Brings the team together to work through snags and competing demands.
06

Get Better Together

Testing, learning, and improving while keeping what works. Teams grow when it is safe to try small things and learn from them.

What it looks like in practice

You respect what already works, run small tests before big rollouts, and let evidence decide what to keep, stop, or adjust.

Research anchors: March, 1991; Edmondson, 1999; Burde, 2016 (see references)

Example behaviors

  • Asks how a working routine could get even better, while respecting why it exists.
  • Looks at past practice with fresh eyes as conditions change.
  • Tries new approaches in small steps and adjusts along the way.
  • Tests a promising alternative without waiting for a problem to force it.
  • Grows a change in measured steps once early signs look good.
  • Keeps a regular rhythm for adjusting how the team works as it learns.

References

  1. Burde, M. S. (2016). The relationship between student achievement and professional learning communities at the middle school level [Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University]. ScholarWorks at WMU. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/1426
  2. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
  3. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827-844. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827
  4. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
  5. Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122005
  6. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632431003663214
  7. Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1pncrt0
  8. Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(1), 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.1.36
  9. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  10. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
  11. Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Harding, F. D., Jacobs, T. O., & Fleishman, E. A. (2000). Leadership skills for a changing world: Solving complex social problems. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 11-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00041-7
  12. Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
  13. Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
  14. Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
  15. Wang, D., Waldman, D. A., & Zhang, Z. (2014). A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034531

See where you are in each domain

Start with the free Leadership Lite reflection, or compare the reports and 360s that go deeper.